Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper vs Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper
Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper and Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper is the more energy-dense option here, packing 340 more calories per 100g than Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long contains 2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper or Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long?
It depends on your goals. Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper has 345 calories, while Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper vegan?
No, Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Super Thin Spring Roll Wrapper and Extra fruit sensations sweet watermelon long?
There is a difference of 340 calories per 100g between the two products.
