Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage vs Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage

Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast

Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
147 kcal
Energy
107 kcal
4.4g
Sugars
1.8g
4.4g
Fat
3.6g
20.6g
Protein
16.1g
1.9g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage and Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage is the more energy-dense option here, packing 40 more calories per 100g than Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage contains significantly more sugar (4.41g) compared to the milder Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast (1.79g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage offers a protein boost with 20.6g per 100g, outperforming Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage or Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage has 147 calories, while Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage vegan?

No, Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Apple Chicken Sausage and Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast?

There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.