Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet complete vs Pitted Castelvetrano Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sweet complete

Sweet complete

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pitted Castelvetrano Olives

Pitted Castelvetrano Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
28.6 kcal
Energy
133.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
13.3g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
4.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet complete and Pitted Castelvetrano Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet complete is the clear winner. With 105 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet complete or Pitted Castelvetrano Olives?

It depends on your goals. Sweet complete has 28.571428571429 calories, while Pitted Castelvetrano Olives has 133.33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet complete vegan?

No, Sweet complete is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet complete and Pitted Castelvetrano Olives?

There is a difference of 105 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.