Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips vs HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP

HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
4g
32.1g
Fat
12g
7.1g
Protein
6g
2.1g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips and HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP (4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips or HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP?

It depends on your goals. Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips has 500 calories, while HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips vegan?

No, Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet maui onion kettle cooked potato chips and HELLO KITTY SPICY NOODLE SOUP?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.