Sweet potato crinkle cut chips vs Foods hard candy
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sweet potato crinkle cut chips
Foods hard candy
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sweet potato crinkle cut chips and Foods hard candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sweet potato crinkle cut chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 486 more calories per 100g than Foods hard candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet potato crinkle cut chips contains significantly more sugar (17.857142857143g) compared to the milder Foods hard candy (16g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Foods hard candy is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Sweet potato crinkle cut chips offers a protein boost with 3.5714285714286g per 100g, outperforming Foods hard candy in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sweet potato crinkle cut chips or Foods hard candy?
It depends on your goals. Sweet potato crinkle cut chips has 535.71428571429 calories, while Foods hard candy has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sweet potato crinkle cut chips vegan?
No, Sweet potato crinkle cut chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sweet potato crinkle cut chips and Foods hard candy?
There is a difference of 486 calories per 100g between the two products.
