Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet Potato with Sea Salt vs Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet Potato with Sea Salt

Sweet Potato with Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips

Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
12.5g
Sugars
0g
33.9g
Fat
21.4g
3.6g
Protein
7.1g
0.8g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet Potato with Sea Salt and Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet Potato with Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet Potato with Sea Salt contains significantly more sugar (12.5g) compared to the milder Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet Potato with Sea Salt or Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Sweet Potato with Sea Salt has 536 calories, while Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet Potato with Sea Salt vegan?

No, Sweet Potato with Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet Potato with Sea Salt and Good & gather organic blue corn tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.