Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet roasted red pepper hummus vs Old World Style Traditional Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sweet roasted red pepper hummus

Sweet roasted red pepper hummus

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Old World Style Traditional Sauce

Old World Style Traditional Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
188 kcal
Energy
56 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.6g
9.4g
Fat
1.2g
6.3g
Protein
1.6g
1.2g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet roasted red pepper hummus and Old World Style Traditional Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet roasted red pepper hummus is the more energy-dense option here, packing 132 more calories per 100g than Old World Style Traditional Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sweet roasted red pepper hummus takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Old World Style Traditional Sauce contains 5.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet roasted red pepper hummus offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Old World Style Traditional Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet roasted red pepper hummus or Old World Style Traditional Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Sweet roasted red pepper hummus has 188 calories, while Old World Style Traditional Sauce has 56 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet roasted red pepper hummus vegan?

No, Sweet roasted red pepper hummus is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet roasted red pepper hummus and Old World Style Traditional Sauce?

There is a difference of 132 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.