Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut vs Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut

Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle

Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
471 kcal
Energy
170 kcal
20.6g
Sugars
37g
23.5g
Fat
0g
5.9g
Protein
1g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut and Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut is the more energy-dense option here, packing 301 more calories per 100g than Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut takes the lead with only 20.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle contains 37g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut offers a protein boost with 5.88g per 100g, outperforming Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut or Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut has 471 calories, while Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut vegan?

No, Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & Salty Nut Peanut and Tropicana orchard style juice apple bottle?

There is a difference of 301 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.