Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & Spicy Pecans vs Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet & Spicy Pecans

Sweet & Spicy Pecans

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats

Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
733 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
0g
66.7g
Fat
2.5g
33.3g
Protein
4g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & Spicy Pecans and Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet & Spicy Pecans is the more energy-dense option here, packing 593 more calories per 100g than Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet & Spicy Pecans contains significantly more sugar (13.3g) compared to the milder Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet & Spicy Pecans offers a protein boost with 33.3g per 100g, outperforming Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & Spicy Pecans or Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & Spicy Pecans has 733 calories, while Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats has 140 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & Spicy Pecans vegan?

No, Sweet & Spicy Pecans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & Spicy Pecans and Organic Quick Cooking Steel Cut Oats?

There is a difference of 593 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.