Sweet & Spicy Tuna vs Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sweet & Spicy Tuna
Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sweet & Spicy Tuna and Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sweet & Spicy Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 6 more calories per 100g than Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sweet & Spicy Tuna or Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets?
It depends on your goals. Sweet & Spicy Tuna has 122 calories, while Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets has 116 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sweet & Spicy Tuna vegan?
No, Sweet & Spicy Tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sweet & Spicy Tuna and Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets?
There is a difference of 6 calories per 100g between the two products.
