Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce vs Organic real french vinaigrette dressing

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce

Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic real french vinaigrette dressing

Organic real french vinaigrette dressing

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
434.5 kcal
34.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
48.3g
0g
Protein
0g
1.7g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce and Organic real french vinaigrette dressing side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce is the clear winner. With 291 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce contains significantly more sugar (34.3g) compared to the milder Organic real french vinaigrette dressing (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic real french vinaigrette dressing is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce or Organic real french vinaigrette dressing?

It depends on your goals. Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce has 143 calories, while Organic real french vinaigrette dressing has 434.4828 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce vegan?

No, Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet & tangy original barbecue sauce and Organic real french vinaigrette dressing?

There is a difference of 291 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.