Head-to-Head Analysis

Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread vs Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread

Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese

Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333.3 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
0g
26.7g
Fat
32.1g
16.7g
Protein
25g
1.5g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread and Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread is the clear winner. With 60 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread contains significantly more sugar (13.33g) compared to the milder Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread or Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread has 333.33 calories, while Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread vegan?

No, Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Swiss Almond Swiss Flavor Snack Spread and Colby Jack Colby & Monterey Jack Cheese?

There is a difference of 60 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.