Head-to-Head Analysis

The Froot Thief vs Salted 313 urban chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of The Froot Thief

The Froot Thief

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted 313 urban chips

Salted 313 urban chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
60 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
12g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing The Froot Thief and Salted 313 urban chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, The Froot Thief is the clear winner. With 440 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. The Froot Thief contains significantly more sugar (12g) compared to the milder Salted 313 urban chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted 313 urban chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: The Froot Thief or Salted 313 urban chips?

It depends on your goals. The Froot Thief has 60 calories, while Salted 313 urban chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is The Froot Thief vegan?

No, The Froot Thief is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between The Froot Thief and Salted 313 urban chips?

There is a difference of 440 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.