Head-to-Head Analysis

The Original Teddy Bear Cookies vs Emirelli Artisanal Halva

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of The Original Teddy Bear Cookies

The Original Teddy Bear Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Emirelli Artisanal Halva

Emirelli Artisanal Halva

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
170 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
9g
17.9g
Fat
9g
7.1g
Protein
4g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing The Original Teddy Bear Cookies and Emirelli Artisanal Halva side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

The Original Teddy Bear Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 294 more calories per 100g than Emirelli Artisanal Halva. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. The Original Teddy Bear Cookies contains significantly more sugar (28.57g) compared to the milder Emirelli Artisanal Halva (9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Emirelli Artisanal Halva is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? The Original Teddy Bear Cookies offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Emirelli Artisanal Halva in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: The Original Teddy Bear Cookies or Emirelli Artisanal Halva?

It depends on your goals. The Original Teddy Bear Cookies has 464.29 calories, while Emirelli Artisanal Halva has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is The Original Teddy Bear Cookies vegan?

No, The Original Teddy Bear Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between The Original Teddy Bear Cookies and Emirelli Artisanal Halva?

There is a difference of 294 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.