Head-to-Head Analysis

Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips vs Sweet Plantain Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Plantain Chips

Sweet Plantain Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
32.1g
28.6g
Fat
21.4g
7.1g
Protein
3.6g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips and Sweet Plantain Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Sweet Plantain Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Plantain Chips contains 32.142857142857g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Plantain Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips or Sweet Plantain Chips?

It depends on your goals. Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips has 536 calories, while Sweet Plantain Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips vegan?

No, Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thin & crispy cantina style tortilla chips and Sweet Plantain Chips?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.