Head-to-Head Analysis

Thin Wheat Crackers vs Mala latiao

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Thin Wheat Crackers

Thin Wheat Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mala latiao

Mala latiao

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
1913 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
30.5g
0g
Protein
6.9g
0g
Salt
5.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thin Wheat Crackers and Mala latiao side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thin Wheat Crackers is the clear winner. With 1913 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thin Wheat Crackers or Mala latiao?

It depends on your goals. Thin Wheat Crackers has 0 calories, while Mala latiao has 1913 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thin Wheat Crackers vegan?

No, Thin Wheat Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thin Wheat Crackers and Mala latiao?

There is a difference of 1913 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.