Head-to-Head Analysis

Thirst quencher vs muscle milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thirst quencher

Thirst quencher

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of muscle milk

muscle milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
22.2 kcal
Energy
48.5 kcal
5.8g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
1.4g
0g
Protein
7.6g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thirst quencher and muscle milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thirst quencher is the clear winner. With 26 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thirst quencher contains significantly more sugar (5.8333333333333g) compared to the milder muscle milk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, muscle milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thirst quencher or muscle milk?

It depends on your goals. Thirst quencher has 22.222222222222 calories, while muscle milk has 48.484848484848 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thirst quencher vegan?

No, Thirst quencher is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thirst quencher and muscle milk?

There is a difference of 26 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.