Head-to-Head Analysis

Time Sweets vs Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Time Sweets

Time Sweets

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar

Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
438 kcal
0g
Sugars
87.5g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Time Sweets and Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Time Sweets is the clear winner. With 438 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Time Sweets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar contains 87.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Time Sweets or Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar?

Time Sweets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Time Sweets vegan?

No, Time Sweets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Time Sweets and Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar?

There is a difference of 438 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.