Toasted rice cereal, original vs Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Toasted rice cereal, original

Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Toasted rice cereal, original and Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Toasted rice cereal, original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 196 more calories per 100g than Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Toasted rice cereal, original contains significantly more sugar (11.1g) compared to the milder Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Toasted rice cereal, original offers a protein boost with 19.4g per 100g, outperforming Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Toasted rice cereal, original or Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine?
It depends on your goals. Toasted rice cereal, original has 389 calories, while Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine has 193 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Toasted rice cereal, original vegan?
No, Toasted rice cereal, original is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Toasted rice cereal, original and Earthly grain90 second microwavable white rice jasmine?
There is a difference of 196 calories per 100g between the two products.




