Head-to-Head Analysis

Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar vs Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar

Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce

Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
519 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
69.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
6.1g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar and Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 519 more calories per 100g than Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar contains significantly more sugar (69.2g) compared to the milder Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar or Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar has 519 calories, while Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar vegan?

No, Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tomato Ketchup 50% Less Sodium & Sugar and Chunky Garlic & Jalapeño Hot Sauce?

There is a difference of 519 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.