Head-to-Head Analysis

Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew vs Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew

Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers

Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
180 kcal
Energy
438 kcal
20g
Sugars
0g
7g
Fat
9.4g
1g
Protein
6.3g
30g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew and Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew is the clear winner. With 258 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew or Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew has 180 calories, while Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers has 438 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew vegan?

No, Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tropical fruit trail mix pound walnut cashew and Nabisco Premium Saltine Crackers?

There is a difference of 258 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.