Head-to-Head Analysis

Tropical harmony vs Black pitted large california ripe olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tropical harmony

Tropical harmony

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Black pitted large california ripe olives

Black pitted large california ripe olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
237 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
50.7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
10g
3.4g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tropical harmony and Black pitted large california ripe olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tropical harmony is the more energy-dense option here, packing 137 more calories per 100g than Black pitted large california ripe olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tropical harmony contains significantly more sugar (50.7g) compared to the milder Black pitted large california ripe olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Black pitted large california ripe olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Tropical harmony offers a protein boost with 3.38g per 100g, outperforming Black pitted large california ripe olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tropical harmony or Black pitted large california ripe olives?

It depends on your goals. Tropical harmony has 237 calories, while Black pitted large california ripe olives has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tropical harmony vegan?

No, Tropical harmony is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tropical harmony and Black pitted large california ripe olives?

There is a difference of 137 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.