Tuna vs Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tuna
Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tuna and Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna is the clear winner. With 26 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Looking to build muscle? Tuna offers a protein boost with 27.4g per 100g, outperforming Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tuna or Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon?
It depends on your goals. Tuna has 115 calories, while Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon has 141 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Tuna vegan?
No, Tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tuna and Wild Caught Sockeye Salmon?
There is a difference of 26 calories per 100g between the two products.
