Tuna 40% Fat Down vs Original Ruffles
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tuna 40% Fat Down
Original Ruffles
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tuna 40% Fat Down and Original Ruffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna 40% Fat Down is the clear winner. With 427 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Tuna 40% Fat Down takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Ruffles contains 1.79g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Tuna 40% Fat Down offers a protein boost with 19.3g per 100g, outperforming Original Ruffles in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tuna 40% Fat Down or Original Ruffles?
Tuna 40% Fat Down appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Tuna 40% Fat Down vegan?
No, Tuna 40% Fat Down is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tuna 40% Fat Down and Original Ruffles?
There is a difference of 427 calories per 100g between the two products.
