Tuna Fillets in BRINE vs Chocolate hazelnut crisp
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tuna Fillets in BRINE
Chocolate hazelnut crisp
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tuna Fillets in BRINE and Chocolate hazelnut crisp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna Fillets in BRINE is the clear winner. With 415 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Tuna Fillets in BRINE takes the lead with only 1.66666666666667g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate hazelnut crisp contains 24.193548387097g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Tuna Fillets in BRINE offers a protein boost with 24.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate hazelnut crisp in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tuna Fillets in BRINE or Chocolate hazelnut crisp?
Tuna Fillets in BRINE appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Tuna Fillets in BRINE vegan?
No, Tuna Fillets in BRINE is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tuna Fillets in BRINE and Chocolate hazelnut crisp?
There is a difference of 415 calories per 100g between the two products.
