Head-to-Head Analysis

Tuna Kimbap vs Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tuna Kimbap

Tuna Kimbap

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original

Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
174.7 kcal
Energy
565 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
5.7g
Fat
35.3g
4.9g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
4.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tuna Kimbap and Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna Kimbap is the clear winner. With 390 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tuna Kimbap or Original?

It depends on your goals. Tuna Kimbap has 174.7131930891 calories, while Original has 565 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tuna Kimbap vegan?

No, Tuna Kimbap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tuna Kimbap and Original?

There is a difference of 390 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.