Head-to-Head Analysis

TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS vs Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS

TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives

Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
193 kcal
Energy
2160 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
12.3g
Fat
200g
19.3g
Protein
0g
1.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS and Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS is the clear winner. With 1967 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS contains significantly more sugar (1.75g) compared to the milder Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS offers a protein boost with 19.3g per 100g, outperforming Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS or Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives?

It depends on your goals. TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS has 193 calories, while Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives has 2160 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS vegan?

No, TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between TURKEY BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS and Authentic Greek Kalamata Olives?

There is a difference of 1967 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.