Head-to-Head Analysis

Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor vs Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor

Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits

Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
3.3g
33.3g
Fat
5g
6.7g
Protein
10g
2.5g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor and Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor is the more energy-dense option here, packing 133 more calories per 100g than Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor contains significantly more sugar (16.7g) compared to the milder Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits (3.3333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor or Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits?

It depends on your goals. Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor has 533 calories, while Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor vegan?

No, Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Turtle Chips - Korean Style Chicken Flavor and Multi-Grain Pretzel Splits?

There is a difference of 133 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.