Head-to-Head Analysis

Tuscan-Style Beef vs Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tuscan-Style Beef

Tuscan-Style Beef

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth

Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
45.6 kcal
Energy
16.3 kcal
1.6g
Sugars
0g
1.6g
Fat
0.2g
2.5g
Protein
3.7g
0.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tuscan-Style Beef and Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tuscan-Style Beef is the more energy-dense option here, packing 29 more calories per 100g than Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tuscan-Style Beef contains significantly more sugar (1.59g) compared to the milder Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tuscan-Style Beef or Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth?

It depends on your goals. Tuscan-Style Beef has 45.6 calories, while Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth has 16.3265 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tuscan-Style Beef vegan?

No, Tuscan-Style Beef is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tuscan-Style Beef and Culinary treasures gluten free organic chicken bonebroth?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.