Head-to-Head Analysis

Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies vs Chunk Style Pink Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies

Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chunk Style Pink Salmon

Chunk Style Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
97.8 kcal
36.7g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
1.1g
3.3g
Protein
21.7g
0.6g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies and Chunk Style Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 335 more calories per 100g than Chunk Style Pink Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies contains significantly more sugar (36.7g) compared to the milder Chunk Style Pink Salmon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chunk Style Pink Salmon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies or Chunk Style Pink Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies has 433 calories, while Chunk Style Pink Salmon has 97.826086956522 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies vegan?

No, Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ube Tea Cookies Purple Yam Shortbread Cookies and Chunk Style Pink Salmon?

There is a difference of 335 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.