Head-to-Head Analysis

ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate vs Coca-Cola Original Taste

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate

ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Coca-Cola Original Taste

Coca-Cola Original Taste

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
40 kcal
Energy
4000 kcal
0.3g
Sugars
1100g
0.2g
Fat
0g
9.2g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate and Coca-Cola Original Taste side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate is the clear winner. With 3960 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate takes the lead with only 0.308g of sugar per 100g, whereas Coca-Cola Original Taste contains 1100g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate offers a protein boost with 9.23g per 100g, outperforming Coca-Cola Original Taste in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate or Coca-Cola Original Taste?

ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate vegan?

No, ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ULTRA PROTEIN high protein milk shake chocolate and Coca-Cola Original Taste?

There is a difference of 3960 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.