Head-to-Head Analysis

Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added vs Traditional Refried Beans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added

Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Traditional Refried Beans

Traditional Refried Beans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
75 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
0.8g
4.5g
Fat
1.3g
16.1g
Protein
4.2g
2.5g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added and Traditional Refried Beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added is the more energy-dense option here, packing 50 more calories per 100g than Traditional Refried Beans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added contains significantly more sugar (5.36g) compared to the milder Traditional Refried Beans (0.833g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Traditional Refried Beans is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added offers a protein boost with 16.1g per 100g, outperforming Traditional Refried Beans in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added or Traditional Refried Beans?

It depends on your goals. Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added has 125 calories, while Traditional Refried Beans has 75 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added vegan?

No, Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ultra Thin Honey Ham Water Added and Traditional Refried Beans?

There is a difference of 50 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.