Head-to-Head Analysis

Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vs Hardwood Smoked Bacon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ultra Thin Smoked Ham

Ultra Thin Smoked Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hardwood Smoked Bacon

Hardwood Smoked Bacon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107.1 kcal
Energy
466.7 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
40g
16.1g
Protein
26.7g
3g
Salt
4.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and Hardwood Smoked Bacon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is the clear winner. With 360 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Hardwood Smoked Bacon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hardwood Smoked Bacon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ultra Thin Smoked Ham or Hardwood Smoked Bacon?

It depends on your goals. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham has 107.14 calories, while Hardwood Smoked Bacon has 466.67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vegan?

No, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and Hardwood Smoked Bacon?

There is a difference of 360 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.