Head-to-Head Analysis

UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM vs Spicy sweet chili

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM

UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Spicy sweet chili

Spicy sweet chili

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
0g
Sugars
1g
0g
Fat
11g
0g
Protein
2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM and Spicy sweet chili side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM is the clear winner. With 138 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM or Spicy sweet chili?

UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM vegan?

No, UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between UNDERBRUSH REMINERALIZING GUM and Spicy sweet chili?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.