Head-to-Head Analysis

Unsweetened coconut flakes vs Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Unsweetened coconut flakes

Unsweetened coconut flakes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt

Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
700 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
10g
Sugars
3.6g
60g
Fat
50g
10g
Protein
17.9g
0.2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Unsweetened coconut flakes and Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Unsweetened coconut flakes is the more energy-dense option here, packing 129 more calories per 100g than Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Unsweetened coconut flakes contains significantly more sugar (10g) compared to the milder Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Unsweetened coconut flakes or Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Unsweetened coconut flakes has 700 calories, while Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Unsweetened coconut flakes vegan?

No, Unsweetened coconut flakes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Unsweetened coconut flakes and Cashew Halves & Pieces Seasoned with Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 129 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.