Head-to-Head Analysis

Vanilla Almond vs Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Vanilla Almond

Vanilla Almond

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
365 kcal
Energy
520 kcal
30.8g
Sugars
0g
13.5g
Fat
28g
23.1g
Protein
4g
1g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Vanilla Almond and Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Vanilla Almond is the clear winner. With 155 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Vanilla Almond contains significantly more sugar (30.8g) compared to the milder Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Vanilla Almond offers a protein boost with 23.1g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Vanilla Almond or Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips?

It depends on your goals. Vanilla Almond has 365 calories, while Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips has 520 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Vanilla Almond vegan?

No, Vanilla Almond is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Vanilla Almond and Sweet Chili Tostones Crunchy Green Plantain Chips?

There is a difference of 155 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.