Vegetable snacker vs Sweet 'n salty mix
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Vegetable snacker
Sweet 'n salty mix
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Vegetable snacker and Sweet 'n salty mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Vegetable snacker is the more energy-dense option here, packing 14 more calories per 100g than Sweet 'n salty mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Vegetable snacker takes the lead with only 6.25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet 'n salty mix contains 34.29g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Vegetable snacker or Sweet 'n salty mix?
It depends on your goals. Vegetable snacker has 500 calories, while Sweet 'n salty mix has 485.71 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Vegetable snacker vegan?
No, Vegetable snacker is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Vegetable snacker and Sweet 'n salty mix?
There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.
