Head-to-Head Analysis

Walnuts halves & vs Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Walnuts halves &

Walnuts halves &

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale

Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
643 kcal
Energy
168 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
64.3g
Fat
2.3g
14.3g
Protein
3.2g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Walnuts halves & and Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Walnuts halves & is the more energy-dense option here, packing 475 more calories per 100g than Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Walnuts halves & contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Walnuts halves & offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Walnuts halves & or Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale?

It depends on your goals. Walnuts halves & has 643 calories, while Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale has 168 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Walnuts halves & vegan?

No, Walnuts halves & is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Walnuts halves & and Organic Brown & Red Rice with Chia & Kale?

There is a difference of 475 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.