Head-to-Head Analysis

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar vs Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz

Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433.3 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
28.3g
Sugars
28.6g
11.7g
Fat
14.3g
15g
Protein
7.1g
1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar and Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 5 more calories per 100g than Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar offers a protein boost with 15g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar or Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz?

It depends on your goals. White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar has 433.333333333333 calories, while Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz has 428.5714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar vegan?

No, White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar and Nabisco Cookies-Single Serve Chocolate 1X1 Oz?

There is a difference of 5 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.