Head-to-Head Analysis

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar vs Blueberry Fruit Spread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Blueberry Fruit Spread

Blueberry Fruit Spread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
382 kcal
Energy
203 kcal
43.3g
Sugars
48g
10.3g
Fat
0g
13.2g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar and Blueberry Fruit Spread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 179 more calories per 100g than Blueberry Fruit Spread. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar takes the lead with only 43.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas Blueberry Fruit Spread contains 48g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar offers a protein boost with 13.2g per 100g, outperforming Blueberry Fruit Spread in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar or Blueberry Fruit Spread?

It depends on your goals. White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar has 382 calories, while Blueberry Fruit Spread has 203 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar vegan?

No, White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar and Blueberry Fruit Spread?

There is a difference of 179 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.