Head-to-Head Analysis

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars vs Oat Bar Coconut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Oat Bar Coconut

Oat Bar Coconut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
382.4 kcal
Energy
419 kcal
30.9g
Sugars
23.3g
10.3g
Fat
16.3g
13.2g
Protein
7g
0.8g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars and Oat Bar Coconut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars is the clear winner. With 37 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars contains significantly more sugar (30.88g) compared to the milder Oat Bar Coconut (23.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Oat Bar Coconut is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars offers a protein boost with 13.24g per 100g, outperforming Oat Bar Coconut in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars or Oat Bar Coconut?

It depends on your goals. White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars has 382.35 calories, while Oat Bar Coconut has 419 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars vegan?

No, White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars and Oat Bar Coconut?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.