Head-to-Head Analysis

Whole Almonds Chili Lime vs Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Whole Almonds Chili Lime

Whole Almonds Chili Lime

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks

Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
588 kcal
Energy
324 kcal
5.9g
Sugars
70.6g
52.9g
Fat
0g
20.6g
Protein
2.9g
1.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whole Almonds Chili Lime and Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Whole Almonds Chili Lime is the more energy-dense option here, packing 264 more calories per 100g than Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Whole Almonds Chili Lime takes the lead with only 5.88g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks contains 70.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Whole Almonds Chili Lime offers a protein boost with 20.6g per 100g, outperforming Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whole Almonds Chili Lime or Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks?

It depends on your goals. Whole Almonds Chili Lime has 588 calories, while Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks has 324 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whole Almonds Chili Lime vegan?

No, Whole Almonds Chili Lime is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whole Almonds Chili Lime and Cotton candy marshmallow flavored chicks?

There is a difference of 264 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.