Head-to-Head Analysis

Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews vs Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews

Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar

Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2160 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
12.7g
Sugars
100g
166g
Fat
0g
63.8g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews and Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1760 more calories per 100g than Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews takes the lead with only 12.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar contains 100g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews offers a protein boost with 63.8g per 100g, outperforming Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews or Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar?

It depends on your goals. Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews has 2160 calories, while Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews vegan?

No, Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whole Roasted & Salted Cashews and Premium Pure Cane Granulated Sugar?

There is a difference of 1760 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.