Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets vs Tuna ventresca in olive oil
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
Tuna ventresca in olive oil
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets and Tuna ventresca in olive oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is the clear winner. With 141 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets or Tuna ventresca in olive oil?
It depends on your goals. Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets has 94 calories, while Tuna ventresca in olive oil has 235 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets vegan?
No, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets and Tuna ventresca in olive oil?
There is a difference of 141 calories per 100g between the two products.
