Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild albacore solid white tuna vs Wild nova salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild albacore solid white tuna

Wild albacore solid white tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild nova salmon

Wild nova salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
132.7 kcal
Energy
94.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
1.2g
28.3g
Protein
20g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild albacore solid white tuna and Wild nova salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild albacore solid white tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 39 more calories per 100g than Wild nova salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Wild albacore solid white tuna offers a protein boost with 28.318584070796g per 100g, outperforming Wild nova salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild albacore solid white tuna or Wild nova salmon?

It depends on your goals. Wild albacore solid white tuna has 132.74336283186 calories, while Wild nova salmon has 94.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild albacore solid white tuna vegan?

No, Wild albacore solid white tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild albacore solid white tuna and Wild nova salmon?

There is a difference of 39 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.