Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Argentine Red Shrimp vs Chunk White Tuna Albacore

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Argentine Red Shrimp

Wild Argentine Red Shrimp

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chunk White Tuna Albacore

Chunk White Tuna Albacore

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
106 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
2.2g
0g
Protein
20.4g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Argentine Red Shrimp and Chunk White Tuna Albacore side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Argentine Red Shrimp is the clear winner. With 106 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Argentine Red Shrimp or Chunk White Tuna Albacore?

It depends on your goals. Wild Argentine Red Shrimp has 0 calories, while Chunk White Tuna Albacore has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Argentine Red Shrimp vegan?

No, Wild Argentine Red Shrimp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Argentine Red Shrimp and Chunk White Tuna Albacore?

There is a difference of 106 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.