Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water vs Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water

Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp

Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97.3 kcal
Energy
70.5 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0.9g
19.5g
Protein
13.2g
0.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water and Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 27 more calories per 100g than Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water offers a protein boost with 19.5g per 100g, outperforming Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water or Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp?

It depends on your goals. Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water has 97.3 calories, while Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp has 70.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water vegan?

No, Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Alaskan Pink Salmon in water and Wild caught peeled & deveined medium raw shrimp?

There is a difference of 27 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.