Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet vs Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet

Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large

Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
179 kcal
Energy
82.4 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
5.7g
Fat
1.8g
8.5g
Protein
14.1g
1.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet and Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet is the more energy-dense option here, packing 97 more calories per 100g than Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet contains significantly more sugar (1.89g) compared to the milder Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet or Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large?

It depends on your goals. Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet has 179 calories, while Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large has 82.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet vegan?

No, Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet and Cooked shrimp peeled deveined tail-on large?

There is a difference of 97 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.