Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) vs Coconut clusters

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay)

Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay)

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Coconut clusters

Coconut clusters

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
114 kcal
Energy
160 kcal
4.3g
Sugars
6g
1.4g
Fat
12g
20g
Protein
3g
1.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) and Coconut clusters side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) is the clear winner. With 46 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) takes the lead with only 4.29g of sugar per 100g, whereas Coconut clusters contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Coconut clusters in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) or Coconut clusters?

Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) vegan?

No, Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Light Tuna (Old Bay) and Coconut clusters?

There is a difference of 46 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.