Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught tuna vs Atlantic salmon in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild caught tuna

Wild caught tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Atlantic salmon in water

Atlantic salmon in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
132.7 kcal
Energy
202 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
13.2g
28.3g
Protein
21.1g
0.8g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught tuna and Atlantic salmon in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught tuna is the clear winner. With 69 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Wild caught tuna offers a protein boost with 28.318584070796g per 100g, outperforming Atlantic salmon in water in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught tuna or Atlantic salmon in water?

It depends on your goals. Wild caught tuna has 132.74336283186 calories, while Atlantic salmon in water has 202 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild caught tuna vegan?

No, Wild caught tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught tuna and Atlantic salmon in water?

There is a difference of 69 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.